2011 Legal Studies Crime Essay Help Me Solve Word Problems

The amendment to the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 expands the category of offences in respect of which a Local Court may receive and consider victim impact statements to include some Table 1 offences (Table 1 of Schedule 1 to the Criminal Procedure Act 1986).Table 1 offences are indictable offences, which are dealt with summarily unless prosecutor or accused elects otherwise and which result in actual physical bodily harm to any person, or involve an act of actual or threatened violence or an act of sexual assault.- Another member of the gang rape had his sperm frozen at no expense so he could have a family after being released from goal (he was diagnosed with cancer and the treatment would leave him sterile).Mr Iemma was quoted as saying "I find the notion of serious criminal offenders being afforded this type of privilege totally repugnant and it will be stopped immediately." The commercial rate is about 0 a year and would now be set and the rapist be told to pay up.When Bilal Skaf’s conviction was set aside by the Court of Criminal Appeal (R v Skaf [2004] NSWCCA) the court called for change to penalise recalcitrant jurors, which was approved.However, no real consideration was given to how effective the penalty provisions might be.At the time of the sentencing, society was strongly against gang rapes as there was considerably more media coverage of gang rapes than in previous times.When Justice Finnane sentenced Bilal Skaf to 55 years imprisonment he was upholding not only the facts of the case but the thoughts and feelings of the community towards the case.

However, was the fact that one high profile trial had to be re-heard, sufficient justification for new criminal sanctions against jurors?On 20 December 2001 the applicant was found guilty on all counts.Between 29 April 2002 and 7 June 2002 there was a second trial, again by judge and jury, in which the applicant stood trial charged with offences of detain for advantage, aggravated indecent assault in company, aggravated act of indecency in company, three counts of aggravated sexual intercourse without consent (in company) and two counts of perverting the course of justice.However, the second trial would be traumatic for the victims, as they would have to face their attacker again.For that reason, the use of a victim impact statement was necessary, but questions were raised as to whether a court transcript would be as effective in trying to create emotions that were felt during the original trial.A woman, named C at the trial (she later revealed her identity on the 60 Minutes television program) was lured from a train at Bankstown by the promise of marijuana.She was then raped at three separate locations by 14 males over a period of six hours.Another victim was raped at gunpoint by two males at Gosling Park, Greenacre, having been lured there by one of the rapists, who was an acquaintance.She escaped before she could be raped by another twelve males waiting their turn.The original sentence reflected the thoughts and ideas of the community towards gang rapists at the time of the court hearing.Community standards were upheld by Justice Finnane DCJ.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “2011 Legal Studies Crime Essay”

  1. I would have chosen to write about my brother, who had been deployed as a soldier overseas and had come back recently after five years, however the essay would be more about him than me.