Bergson Essay On Laughter Armenian Genocide Essay 2010
In the absence of thorough comprehension of what a class struggled with—poorly trained teachers, exam-oriented learning, children whose difficult home lives kept them from coming or from concentrating—the computers became little more than a performance of progress.
The fundamental incompatibility between the possibilities of computers (access to knowledge beyond a classroom’s restrictions, freedom to pursue intellectual interests, independent research) and the narrow aims of the education system remained unaddressed. A geography teacher, made to attend a mandatory training session in the school’s new computer room, took a seat at his assigned PC and unfolded a newspaper.
The teachers’ laughter, then, was not only an expression of hilarity but a mode of utterance when no other was available. Nor could it solve the human issues—poor training, large classes—that burdened schools.Although his analysis focuses upon the comedy of manners, it is applicable to Carroll's humor as well.Like Carroll, Bergson lived through the technological revolution that made the duality of man and machine a vital concern of philosophers, novelists, poets, and humorists.The problem with any serious discussion of humor, of course, is that the analysis inevitably destroys the fun.How much more satisfying it is to elucidate Hamlet's melancholy than to explain Falstaff's jokes!So when the creativity and adaptability of the human form are co-opted by the attitudes and gestures of a machine, we find it funny. Bergson’s theory of laughter—that what we find funny is inflexibility, or a failure to adapt—marks a new set of signals by which to pay attention to the shortcomings of development aid.Is this how the teachers felt—that they had been turned into implements in an aid arrangement? Diop was an English teacher at the school, a champion of computer usage. The room was a collection of grinning children in soiled tunics and trousers, their hearts bursting with enthusiasm. , we’ve spent the last 15 years producing uncompromising journalism.In classes, red-eyed kids dozed, while others leaped up, eager to answer, even when they didn’t know the answer. Thiam began to ask questions to test comprehension. Meanwhile, beyond the gates of the school, women, possibly the mothers of these children, hiked up waxcloth skirts to sit before baskets of peanuts and madd fruit.They were learning the gestures, if nothing else, of acquiring an education. Boys little older than the ones in the classroom hawked alphabet books and roach poison., Lewis Carroll's first version of the story, contemporary reviews, and other materials.(The preceding link contains the full table of contents.) cholars, critics, psychoanalysts, and logicians have all scrutinized Carroll's writings; but few of them have offered an explanation of why or how his creations are funny.