Developing A Thesis For A Book Review Essays On Computer Technology

Writing a book review requires that you assess the books strengths and weaknesses as they pertain to historiography - it is not a literary review.

You should also tell the reader why you liked or disliked the book.

The three parts of the critical book review for the historian are: who wrote it, why did they write it, and what do they have to offer. Arguments are intended to extend our knowledge, and also can be described as having three parts: a premise, supporting evidence, and a conclusion.The objectives in book reviews between the disciplines are different animals.The most difficult part of any assignment is understanding what needs to be done, and how.Attempt to summarize the authors thesis in a single sentence.This may be difficult if the author has merely implied rather than explicitly explained his or her thesis.Book reviews are short and concise, they may vary from half a page to several pages depending on the assignment.The introduction is extremely important, it must be short, effective, and it must contain your thesis.Developing a good thesis is often the most difficult part of writing.What happened, why is it interesting, why or how did it happen?I also suspected that there was a difference in the objectives between English and History critical book reviews.My suspicions were confirmed as soon as I read some critical history book reviews.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “Developing A Thesis For A Book Review”

  1. Egyptian pro-democracy activists mobilized two major uprisings in recent years: one ending Hosni Mubarak’s decades-long rule in February 2011, and the other precipitating a coup against newly-elected president Mohamed Morsi in July 2013.