Presidential Or Parliamentary System Essay Letter Writing Paper For Kids
The presidential and parliamentary systems have lots of different characteristics in their nature and practical running, and each of them have their own virtues and vices.Facing the change of the world political situation and the new democracies, they have got their own advantages to the development of the new democracies; however, there is no universal answer for all the countries in world of which system is more suitable for their new democracies.The example of head of state in the modern states include the Queen of England, Elizabeth II, the Emperor of Japan, Akihito (cite?) and their function is to symbolize the state and responsible for the external issues like receiving ambassadors and performing many of the ceremonial tasks.
The discussion and challenges from the legislature would also bring more opinion and thoughts to the government and higher quality and more rounded policies can be made.Since the government is elected and chosen by the parliament, the power of parliament is strong enough to turn over the government.“The parliamentary system offers no job security” (cite).There are different elections for electing the members of the executive and legislative branches respectively and hence the two branches may be controlled by different political parties.The parliamentary system is another major political system accounting for around 30% of all the governments (p.42) in the modern world and the assembly is allowed to remove the government (p.34).You can view samples of our professional work here.Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UK Essays. Which system is more suitable to new democracies, and why? Different countries in the world have got their own political system in order to have their countries run and organized and most of them belong to two major systems, namely presidential and parliamentary system and with their own unique characteristics.The chief executive will lose his position if the policies he proposed is not favored by the legislators, hence, the policies made by the parliamentary government would be more conservative if there is not an absolute majority party.Also, the quality of the policies does not have promise since they are less challenged and discussed by the legislators.Disclaimer: This work has been submitted by a student.This is not an example of the work produced by our Essay Writing Service.